|
|
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
|
|
Posted at 08:27 PM | Permalink
Posted at 09:00 AM | Permalink
(This is an excerpt from the sermon I gave on Sun Nov 10, 2024, after the election.... see/listen to the whole thing HERE )
Posted at 11:25 AM | Permalink
Blessed Are Those Who Mourn
- for they shall be comforted.... Jesus, Matt 5:4
Posted at 07:13 AM | Permalink
Posted at 12:06 PM | Permalink
VOTIVATOR
How I’m Voting Nov 5
First of all, it ought to go without saying that this election is momentous. Democracy itself is on the ballot. The list of reasons to vote against Trump is very, very long – but I think it is important, in communicating with people inclined to vote Republican, that we should keep things very simple. Trump denied the outcome of the 2020 election and has pushed his lies about it ever since, and the consequences have been devastating – and Jan 6, 2021 was only one of them. He lied and people died. The trust of the people in the process of elections has been severely damaged. If people don’t believe in the outcome of elections, then the Constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s written upon. Trump has repeatedly violated his oath of office to protect and defend our Constitution, and therefore he must be considered unqualified for any office in the land.
So with enthusiasm I’m voting for Kamala Harris and for Democrats all the way down the ballot. (And I’ve been knocking on doors for George Whitesides for Congress in the close election for the 27th CA District – let me know if you’d like to join me!)
I don't follow LA City/County issues closely any more, because I'm in Ventura County now - but I've always voted pretty closely with the recommendations of the LA Times: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-09-10/los-angeles-times-elections-endorsements-2024-november . I also have a lot of respect for the info provided by LAist.com - our regional NPR station: https://laist.com/news/politics/voter-game-plan
Here are the LA Times rec’s for propositions – with my notes/additions in italics:
Proposition 2 is a $10 billion bond that will fund repairs for California’s public schools and community colleges, many of which are run-down and lack basic functionality, such as air conditioning.
Proposition 3: Yes Re: same-sex marriage - reverses Prop. 8 which is unenforceable now, but which in 2008 banned same sex marriage.
Proposition 3 gives Californians an opportunity to formally renounce a wrongful moment in our voting history and step forward to positively affirm that bigotry toward same-sex couples has no place in our state or its Constitution.
Proposition 4: Yes
Proposition 4 is a $10 billion grab bag of spending on climate, fire prevention, energy, conservation and agriculture projects so disparate that this bond measure almost defies categorization. But it is still better to spend money today to prepare for climate change than to pay much more to respond in the future.
Proposition 5: Yes Substantially corrects one of the most onerous features of Prop 13 from 1978.....
Proposition 5 would get California closer to majority rule by lowering the threshold to pass local bond measures to 55% instead of 66.7%. We think it’s a fairer way to make spending and taxing decisions. Requiring supermajority support gives disproportionate power to the naysayers to decide the appropriate level of taxation and spending. Why should one-third of voters get to set priorities for an entire community?
Proposition 6: Yes
Proposition 6 will remove the language in the state Constitution that allows prisons to force incarcerated people to work and punish them when they refuse. If we want people to emerge from prison rehabilitated — and if we care about public safety, we should — that requires allowing them to access as many opportunities as possible to get an education, learn a skill and get treatment to best prepare them for a productive life.
Proposition 32: Yes
Proposition 32 would give the state’s lowest-paid workers a modest raise, setting the minimum wage to $18 an hour in January, up from the scheduled $16.50 under current law. Businesses with 25 or fewer workers would have until 2026 to start paying $18 an hour. Earning a decent wage shouldn’t be a privilege afforded to people who happen to work in a city that has a higher local minimum wage, and raising base pay statewide is more equitable than a patchwork of rules for different regions and industries.
Proposition 33: No Re: rent control - sounds good but the devil's in the details - it would obstruct low income housing development. This proposition was put on the ballot by the fabulously rich AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which ought to "stick to its knitting" and focus on its core mission.
Proposition 33 would repeal a state law that restricts local governments’ ability to expand rent control. But it goes too far by including sweeping language that would prohibit the state from imposing any limits on rent controls set by cities and counties in the future, even if they stymie housing construction. "Cities that are anti-growth and don’t want any new housing built could use their authority over rent control (diabolically) to require that developers set extremely low rent caps on new apartment buildings, which would make new multifamily housing financially unfeasible."
Proposition 34: No AIDS Healthcare Foundation in LA has, unfortunately, become a corrupted nonprofit organization that pours millions into political projects that have nothing to do with its core mission. But using the initiative process to punish it for its sins is going way too far....
AIDS Healthcare Foundation calls this a “revenge initiative,” and we agree. Proposition 34 would change the rules for healthcare providers in ways that seem designed to cut off the foundation’s tenant advocacy. Voters should emphatically reject Proposition 34 and send the message that they will not tolerate such a weaponization of the state’s citizen initiative process.
Proposition 35: No This complex problem re: Medi-Cal reimbursement should be hashed out by the people we elect and pay for this purpose - the state legislature. Again, The purpose of this one is righteous, but the devil's in the details -- this one could backfire re: funding Medi-Cal: https://calmatters.org/health/2024/10/prop-35-health-insurance-tax/
Proposition 35 involves a tax on managed-care organizations, Medi-Cal reimbursement rates for medical providers, federal healthcare funding and the state budget. It’s complicated policymaking that is better suited to the full-time Legislature.
Proposition 36 won’t end homelessness or crime waves. Existing laws already give police the tools to stop petty thieves and smash-and-grab robbers. Proposition 36 will only refill prisons, push more people to the streets and erase criminal justice reform progress. And it would suck up much of the funding Californians recently approved for mental health care and gut programs that have successfully slashed recidivism.
Ojai CA: (where we live)
Mayor: Andy Gilman, a long-time resident and community-engaged person. Endorsed by the Ojai Democratic Club. His opponent looks like a reasonable and appropriate candidate as well, though I was turned off when I found out she had worked for Marianne Williamson’s presidential campaign….
Other city candidates are unopposed….
Measure O, Pickleball: No. The City Council decided to ban pickleball at the court near City Hall due to noise, and set up new courts at Soule Park – a reasonable solution. The people who lost that vote put this on the ballot to restore pickleball at the City Hall courts. This is the sort of thing we elect a city council to decide!
Posted at 03:26 PM | Permalink
What if the shooter whose bullet grazed Donald Trump's ear had no motive but the urge to have fun?
What if he woke up that day and thought, "Oh, I could take Dad's semiautomatic rifle and go and shoot somebody famous today - that would be cool." Why go to the firing range, when he could play for keeps?
Such was the motive that led a shooter to kill 60 people with military weapons he fired from a hotel room in Las Vegas in 2017. It appears that he did it because he felt like it. Not out of hatred, but because it was a satisfying form of entertainment. Some folks go to Vegas for the shows and the gambling. He went for the pleasure of shooting people.
What happened on Saturday ought to be the occasion for deep soul-searching by Americans of all political and religious persuasions. We have created a society that produces people who kill people for kicks. To turn this horror around, we have spiritual, cultural, and political work to do.
I run the risk of analyzing this latest event before it has been thoroughly investigated. But it isn't too early to speak out vigorously against a lot of the rhetoric that has followed it. If indeed the mere urge to play motivated the shooting, it ought to re-frame the conversation.
As of today, it appears that Trump is not the victim of political violence, which of course should be universally condemned, but rather of recreational violence committed with a military weapon that no civilian should own. This event should mobilize citizens and politicians to ban civilians from owning weapons which have no practical purpose but the mass killing of human beings. And until serious gun control laws are passed, we must engage in the cultural work of making it cool to engage in life-affirming recreation, and making it uncool to play with weapons of mass mayhem. (Calling all creatives in all mediums: let's get busy with this!)
The shooter hardly fit the stereotypes of someone angry at Donald Trump. He was a white male who wore camo and patriotic tee-shirts and loved shooting guns and was registered as a Republican. So Senator J.D. Vance's instant reaction to blame the shooting on Joe Biden was particularly outrageous. Donald Trump is indeed a mortal danger to democracy, and Biden is absolutely right to make that case, and to continue to make it. Speaking this truth is not an incitement to violence against Trump or anyone else. Let us not fall for this attempt to silence us about the threat to our constitutional order that Trump represents. He is going to use the nick on his ear to amplify his attacks against democracy. Let's not let him get away with it.
Trump is no more a martyr than the 60 folks in Las Vegas who were killed just for fun.
Another outrageous response has come from so-called Christians proclaiming that the hand of God reached down to save Trump from death on Saturday because he is divinely anointed. This is spectacularly bad theology. It begs the question: why did God allow the bystander to be shot to death? Why did God let bullets rip through the other bystanders who were critically injured? God saves Trump but not Trump's loyal followers? Why would an omnipotent God let anyone shoot at people just for laughs? This ought to be an occasion to reconsider belief in a supernatural God who picks and chooses those whom he allows to live and those he allows to suffer and die. Progressive religious people need to double-down on offering an alternative understanding of God as nothing less nor more than unconditional love.
We are called to lift up that love and and spread it. And in particular to share it with the socially alienated. We must transform our society from one that generates loneliness into one that extends conviviality. Progressive religious folks should count this terrible incident as a call to be more vigorous in inviting people, especially those who are isolated, into our faith communities. The salvation we offer is not from hell in an afterlife, but from an empty existence in this one. What if someone had invited the shooter to play a game of tennis on Saturday? Or dominoes? Or to watch a funny movie together? (There are documented stories of people who were on the verge of violence but were held back because someone treated them kindly at exactly the right moment.)
Divine, unconditional love could have saved the day on Saturday. Through our personal and collective action, may it save the day for our country - today and tomorrow.
Posted at 08:49 AM | Permalink
Recently I was in Ohio for the memorial service for my best friend of 65 years. It was a beautiful, soulful time of remembrance and reunion. Bruce and I had a lot in common, and one fascination we shared was with fossils, which abounded in the area around our hometown. Above is a picture of me, last weekend, searching for them behind the school we attended. Near that spot, when I was ten years old, I found the beautiful little crinoid coral flower head pictured here. Who knows how many millions of years ago it swayed in the current at the bottom of an ocean?
Now, I’m the old fossil, a relic left behind by my friend who preceded me into the great sea of eternity.
And that’s okay. Poking around for fossils reminds me of the true place of us humans in the grand scheme of the cosmos. The human era on earth is but a blip in geologic time. Will we be but a thin dark line in the strata looming above a tumbling, turning river at the bottom of some future abyss? Such were my thoughts as I flew home, looking with wonderment into the Grand Canyon out the window of the plane.
We can grieve our finitude, but there is beauty in it. As the Psalmist said, “What are human beings that you are mindful of them, mortals that you care for them? Yet you have made them a little lower than God, and crowned them with glory and honor.”
Who knows what sentient creatures one day will pick through that thin strata of the Anthropocene Era, enraptured?
So let us be in wonderment at our existence, appreciating each other fully, reverencing the universe that brought my best friend to be, and brings the rest of us to be, here and now….
Posted at 08:48 AM | Permalink
I grew up with Mennonites in a little town in Ohio. One of them, a kid named Elmer, was in my class. He wore overalls and boots to school. In the spring, he reeked of the onions he had to thin from the fields of his family’s farm, first thing in the morning. The Mennonite girls wore gingham dresses and very cute little white lace caps on their heads.
We called them black-bumper Mennonites because unlike their Amish cousins, also followers of Menno Simons, the 16th century Dutch founder of their wider religious movement, they would buy brand-new vehicles, mostly vans to haul around their big families, and paint the bumpers black to avoid appearing ostentatious.
Years ago, Roberta and I were wandering the back roads of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, to admire the world of the Amish. We went down a gravel road in our quest to get as close to authentic Amish life as we could. We spied a tall old guy with a long grey beard wearing overalls and the typical straw hat standing by a stall where he sold shoo-fly pie. Which consists basically of flour, shortening, and brown sugar. Which attracts flies. Hence the name. Well, it attracted Roberta very powerfully, so we kicked up a rooster-tail of dust as we stopped. Next thing you know, we took up the old man’s offer for us to stay overnight in the “bed and breakfast” he and his wife maintained in their barn. Price: $20 a night. Roberta was entranced. I laughed when we went into the upstairs of the barn and discovered a fly-infested space with a sway-bottomed spring bed and a toilet that consisted of a plastic bucket with a seat on it, and a shower that drained directly into the corral outside. At breakfast next morning, sitting under the gas lamp above the kitchen table as we ate a hearty meal, Roberta announced that she wanted to be Amish. Our hostess immediately answered: “Oh no you don’t!” and proceeded to describe how much hassle and work it is to be Amish. You have no privacy, your house gets inspected to make sure you’re not living like the “English” – their term for everybody who isn’t Amish. Her main objection to her Amish way of life was that it was more about the appearance of simplicity than simple living itself.
Gandhi made a big deal about living simply. He spun cotton to make the fabric for his simple dhoti clothing. He went about in flip-flops and tried to do life the way poor Indians did. But to maintain this lifestyle while he was leading the nonviolent revolution against the British raj in India, it cost a lot of money and hassle to schlepp his spinning wheel and to deal with all the special accommodations he required. It was anything but simple for his retinue to deal with his proclivity for simplicity.
Simplicity sounds really nice for a lot of us who suffer from the complexities that life hurls our way every day. But it isn’t always simple to live simply, is it? All too often, you end up trading one kind of complexity for another.
When traveling in developing countries, you might be entranced by the joy in the faces of poor people who appear to be enjoying the simple life. And yes, there’s joy in those communities to which we can aspire. But a closer look reveals how much difficulty is involved in the simple life that they appear to be living. Roberta and I visited her son when he was in the Peace Corps in a very remote Quechua village in the Andes of Peru. We loved the place! It was bliss to wander through fields where women were singing beautifully as they picked and shelled peas. But we also were sobered by the tough choices facing the villagers every day. These were proud people whom the Spanish had never bothered to conquer. They did not think of themselves as being poor, which was a spiritual blessing for them. But the deprivations they had to deal with were difficult. They didn’t have to deal with the time-consuming, maddening arcana of the Internal Revenue Service, but they had plenty of other stuff that weighed on their souls and consumed their time and energy.
Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount is a call to simplicity. When you think about the Sermon on the Mount, it helps to be aware that these few chapters in the New Testament were the only words that Jesus’ audience would ever hear from him. There were no newspapers, no televisions, no internet to record and disseminate his words. So we must assume that everything Jesus wanted those folks to hear was in his sermon. And what is very striking about it is what’s not in it. There’s no dogma. No doctrine. No catechism. No statement of faith. It’s not about what to believe, but rather about what to do and how to be. There are admonitions to love and care for others, to give up oppressing others. Don’t worry about your clothes, don’t worry about food. If you don’t worry about stuff, you won’t be obsessed with consumption. You’ll be much more likely to more fully enjoy whatever you already have. It’s simple religion - much, much simpler than the dominant paradigm of Christianity in America today. Apparently, that was all the religion that Jesus thought folks needed. Of course, we’re all going to have to deal with complicated stuff, no matter how hard we try to live simply. But we can approach that complexity with simplicity of spirit.
We can be clear-eyed about what ultimately matters and what ultimately does not. We can cultivate satisfaction with the life we are living today, as it is today, as best we can. We can savor what is good around us and within us. We can value our relationships more than our stuff or our ambitions. We can avoid entanglements that get in the way of our precious relationships. We can cultivate a life of contemplation that makes the mundane sacred.
Simplicity is a way of seeing and being, an ideal to which we can aspire, even as we negotiate and engage with the tangle of tasks and choices that beset us every day. Simplicity of spirit will naturally guide us toward greater simplicity in our way of living. Who knows? If enough of us engage in spiritual simplicity, maybe systematic simplicity will follow!
Posted at 08:44 AM | Permalink
Bounding bootsteps puffing pale dust on the steepening trail, dodging boulders to get to a promontory opening to an aspect to the east of the salt lake below, she stopped upon hearing a yowl, a yelp, a whoop, a holler, a yip, a yap, and turned to seek its source. Where? She swiped her forehead with her bandanna, waited for her breath to abate so she could echolocate. The sound emanated from a jumble of rocks above her. She approached as the howling got louder. It came from – a stone? About the size of a loaf of bread. Can this be? Her jaw went slack as sweat dripped off her nose. She drank a slug of water and splattered some on her face for fear of heatstroke. But as her face cooled, the joyful exaltation from the stone still resounded off the cliffs and down the desert mountain. She feared, but what was to fear? It was the sheer sound of untrammeled joy. And as she looked about, exhilarated, she shared in that joy. The stone seemed to celebrate the stupendous grandeur that surrounded her. So as the stone roared, she began to whoop along with it. It responded to her yelps with more of its own. Back and forth, in crescendo and diminuendo, in falsetto with bravado, they resonated until in exhaustion she paused, and the stone went quiet, and she asked:
“Who or what are you?”
The stone replied:
“I will answer. But first you must tell me who or what you are.”
“Dorit,” she answered, hesitantly. “My name is Dorit.”
“That’s the name to which you answer. But who are you?”
“Uhhh…. A marketing executive.”
“That’s what you do, but who are you?”
After a silence she spoke. “A human being?”
“Well, you are getting closer,” said the stone.
“Closer to what?” she asked, bewildered.
“Closer to who you really are. But let’s get closer yet. Are you only your human mind and body?”
“Well, not just…”
“So what are you? Your thoughts and feelings?”
“What do you mean?” she asked, taking off her backpack and setting it against a rock wall and wiping sweat from her face.
“You aren’t just your body nor just your mind nor just what your mind experiences. Who or what is aware of your body and your mind and your experiences?”
No one had ever asked Dorit such a question before.
She sat on a boulder in silence that the stone did not interrupt. She observed her breath, her sweat, her sore leg muscles, the aroma of her perspiration, her swirl of thoughts and her shock at having a conversation with a stone. For the first time she asked herself: who or what was doing the observing? “The universe? God? Consciousness itself?”
“Ahhh!” blurted the stone loudly. “Yesss! Waaaahooooo!” – followed by more whoops and echoing howls. Dorit could not help but howl along. As she caught her breath, she said: “It’s your turn to tell me who you are!”
“Fair enough! I am who and what you are.”
She stared at the stone in stunned silence. “But you are a stone. How can you speak?”
“How can I not speak? How can I not shout with joy, any less than you?”
And together they howled and hollered till the sun hid behind the mountain and the moon rose over the desert to the east.......
Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness, where for forty days he was tempted by the devil. He ate nothing at all during those days, and when they were over, he was famished. The devil said to him, “If you are the Son of God, command this stone to become a loaf of bread.” Jesus answered him, “It is written, ‘One does not live by bread alone.’ ” Luke 4: 1- 4
Now as he (Jesus) was approaching the path down from the Mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to praise God joyfully with a loud voice for all the deeds of power that they had seen, saying,
“Blessed is the king
who comes in the name of the Lord!
Peace in heaven,
and glory in the highest heaven!”
Some of the Pharisees in the crowd said to him, “Teacher, order your disciples to stop.” He answered, “I tell you, if these were silent, the stones would shout out.” Luke 19: 37 - 40
Posted at 08:41 AM | Permalink